Skip to content

Laser Therapy: Choosing the Ideal Device for Your Practice

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) is steadily gaining traction in modern medical practices, offering solutions for pain management, fat loss, fungal nail treatment, and much more. What sets it apart is its non-invasive approach combined with a myriad of therapeutic benefits. For practitioners contemplating the inclusion of LLLT in their treatment regimen, the selection of an appropriate device is paramount for ensuring optimal patient outcomes. This article aims to elucidate the various LLLT device options and assist you in determining the most fitting device for your practice.

A woman being treated with an LLLT device for pain relief
Erchonia’s EVRL® Laser: The only LLLT device to be FDA Market Cleared for treating chronic / acute back, neck, and shoulder pain, and pain associated with surgery.

Differentiating Between Laser Therapy Devices

Class Distinctions

Using the FDA’s distinction between class 4 and class 2/3 lasers, we can differentiate High-Powered Laser Therapy (also known as High-Intensity or High-Level Laser Therapy) from Low-Level Laser Therapy in the following way:

  • High-Powered Laser Therapy devices are classified as ‘Class IV Lasers’ in virtue of having a power output that’s greater than 500mW (i.e. high risk of hazard). The vast majority of such devices have longer near-infrared wavelengths.
  • LLLT devices are classified as either ‘Class IIIB Lasers’, ‘Class IIIR Lasers’, or ‘Class II Lasers’ in virtue of having a power output of 5-500mW, 1-5mW, or <1mW respectively (i.e. lower risk of hazard). The vast majority of LLLT devices have shorter wavelengths.

Research suggests that low-level lasers are the safest and most effective laser therapy devices available on the market today.

Design Variants

LLLT devices can be broadly categorized based on their design:

  • Handheld devices: Designed for precision, these devices allow for targeted treatment, addressing specific areas with ease and flexibility.
  • Stationary devices: These are better suited for treatments covering larger surface areas or for protocols that cater to multiple patients simultaneously.
FX 635 Laser for Pain Relief
Erchonia’s FX 635® Laser: Fully automated LLLT machine – only LLLT device to be FDA-cleared for chronic heel and back pain.

Emission Modes

The manner in which these devices emit laser light can also differ significantly:

  • Continuous wave devices: As the name suggests, these devices produce a consistent and unbroken stream of laser light.
  • Pulsed devices: In contrast, these emit laser light intermittently in short bursts. This modulation can be particularly beneficial for specific applications, including pain management and wound healing.

Criteria for Choosing the Optimal LLLT Device for Your Practice

Before settling on an LLLT device for your medical establishment, it is important to evaluate several key factors:

Evaluating Practice Specifics and Patient Profiles

To successfully implement LLLT, it’s crucial to choose a device that resonates with the specific needs of your patients. Such a strategy not only raises the quality of care but also bolsters patient trust, fostering enduring loyalty.

  • Practice Dynamics: Start by pinpointing the distinct needs and objectives of your practice. Delve into the spectrum of treatments you provide and discern which conditions you seek to ameliorate using LLLT.
  • Patient Composition: Scrutinize the demographic distribution of your clientele. Factors such as age brackets, medical backgrounds, and prevalent conditions will play a pivotal role in ensuring your chosen device dovetails with their needs.
  • Intended Treatment Areas: Ascertain which body regions you plan to administer LLLT to. Keep in mind that specific devices may showcase superior efficacy for particular areas compared to others.

Assessing Device User-Friendliness and Compatibility for LLLT Integration

For a seamless incorporation of an LLLT device into your medical environment, weigh the following considerations related to user-centricity and harmonization:

  • Handling and Ergonomic Considerations: Opt for devices that emphasize effortless handling and precision during treatments. Ergonomic enhancements not only simplify the practitioner’s task but also augment patient comfort, cultivating a more gratifying treatment experience.
  • Device Interface and Navigability: Choose a device that features a well-engineered interface, enhanced by user-friendly controls. Such streamlined features ensure treatments are carried out with efficiency.
  • Tailored Treatment Modalities: Selecting devices with adaptable treatment protocols is crucial. Such devices provide flexibility, enabling practitioners to make personalized modifications, thereby addressing specific patient needs and a broad spectrum of medical conditions.
  • Synergy With Prevailing Practice Management Systems: If your practice already utilizes specific management systems, it’s essential to determine the device’s alignment with them. Seamless integration not only enhances patient record-keeping but also boosts the overall efficiency of the practice.

Support and Training Imperatives for LLLT Device Integration

The smooth integration of an LLLT device into your medical facility hinges on robust technical support. Choose devices that offer reliable technical assistance and prompt manufacturer responses to concerns.

Furthermore, pivot your attention towards manufacturers that offer dedicated training modules. This ensures that both you and your clinical team are adept in leveraging the full potential of the LLLT device.

By keeping these crucial considerations in mind, you can confidently select an LLLT device that resonates with your clinic’s requirements, thus guaranteeing superior patient care.

Therapeutic Versatility and Efficiency: Distinguishing LLLT Devices

LLLT devices are not universally homogeneous; their therapeutic applications and performance can diverge significantly. It’s essential to match your practice’s treatment goals with a device that reflects those objectives.

Take Erchonia®, for instance. Our extensive portfolio encompasses LLLT devices tailored for diverse applications:

  • Pain Management: Erchonia® low-level lasers have shown efficacy in treating a broad spectrum of orthopedic and neuropathic conditions. Our cutting-edge devices offer a non-invasive approach to pain relief, making them a sought-after choice for patients and healthcare professionals alike.
  • Nail Fungus : Specifically designed for fungal nail treatment, these lasers target and address this prevalent condition.
  • Fat & Cellulite Reduction: Devices in this category are devised to bolster fat loss interventions, guiding patients towards their body sculpting aspirations.
  • Veterinary Solutions: Expanding the horizons of LLLT, we cater to animal healthcare with our vet-specific laser systems.
  • Radiation Mitigators: To address growing concerns about cell phone radiation, this product is designed to reduce such exposures in our digital-heavy lives.
  • Therapeutic Accessories & Stands: These adjuncts amplify the efficacy and ease of LLLT procedures, optimizing patient ease and procedural exactness.

We take immense pride in our diverse range of LLLT devices, each endowed with distinct attributes. Recognized for our prowess, Erchonia® stands as a trusted contender when it comes to LLLT providers. If our offerings resonate with your requirements, we invite you to delve deeper into our product range and get in touch with us for more information. We are dedicated to assisting you with the smooth integration of our LLLT devices into your practice, ensuring optimal patient care.

Common FAQs About Erchonia®

What Is the Scientific Evidence Behind Erchonia® Lasers?

All studies carried out to obtain FDA-clearance are double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, and multi-site – the most credible research of all Laser Therapy devices on the market today.

The following list shows the clinical trials and an outline of their progress. As a company, to protect our intellectual assets, not all clinical trials we are involved with are made public so as to maintain our competitive advantage. As such, not all clinical trials are listed below.

Please note: There are hundreds of clinical studies confirming the effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), and every year there are many new publications. Below is a list of Erchonia-specific studies for FDA-clearance.

1) Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain / Low Level Laser — 2000 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. First study done in support of 510(k) submission, second study requested by FDA.

2) Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain / Low Level Laser — 2001 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. Study results used to obtain FDA clearance – K012580
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

3) Low Level Laser Light Therapy as an Aid to Liposuction and Reduction of Pain Associated With Surgery — 2004 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. Study results used to obtain FDA clearance –K041139
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

4) Acne Vulgaris Dermatological Conditions / Low Level Laser — 2005 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K050672

5) Pain Associated With Breast Augmentation Surgery / Low Level Laser — 2007 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. Results used to obtain FDA clearance – K072206
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

6) Non-Invasive Fat Reduction and Body Contouring – Laser Scanner Waist, Hips, and Thighs — 2009 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. Study results used to obtain FDA clearance – K082609
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

7) Equine Wound Healing – 2011 — Sponsor, Case Study.

  1. Study completed from Nov. 2010-March 2011.
  2. Monitored by Hank Jann, DVM, MS, DACVS from Oklahoma State University.

8) Equine Wound Healing – 2011 — Sponsor, placebo controlled, clinical study.

  1. Study completed from Feb. 2011-April 2011.
  2. Monitored by Hank Jann, DVM, MS, DAVCS from Oklahoma State University.

9) Arm Circumference Reduction of the Upper Arms — 2011 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. Study results used to obtain FDA clearance – K120257
  2. Study submitted to be published 2012.
  3. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

10) Appearance of Cellulite (Verju Laser System) — 2012 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K130922
  2. Study submitted to be published 2013.
  3. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

11) Non-Invasive Body Contouring Using GLS Laser – 532 nm (Green) Trade Name Verju — 2012 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K123237
  2. Study submitted to be published 2013.
  3. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

12) Adjunct to Chronic Heel Pain Arising from Plantar Fasciitis Using the Erchonia FX635 Laser 2012 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K132940
  2. Study results published in the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society April 2014
  3. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

13) Non-Invasive Dermatological Aesthetic Treatment for Reduction of Circumference of Hips, Waist and Upper Abdomen When Applied to Individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) Between 30 kg/m2 and 40 kg/m2 2013 – Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K142042
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

14) Non-Invasive Dermatological Aesthetic Treatment for the Reduction of Circumference of Hips, Waist and Thighs (Zerona-Z6 OTC) — 2012 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K143007
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

15) Non-Invasive Dermatological Aesthetic Treatment for the Reduction of Circumference of Hips, Waist, Thighs and Upper Abdomen 6 Week Treatment Protocol (Zerona-Z6) — 2014 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K150446
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

16) Erchonia EVRL (EVRL) – 2016

       a. while using the red diode, for adjunctive use in providing temporary relief of minor chronic neck and shoulder pain of musculoskeletal origin.

       b. and while using the violet diode, to treat dermatological conditions, and specifically indicated to treat moderate inflammatory Acne Vulgaris.

  1. FDA clearance – K152196

17) Temporary Increase of Clear Nail in Patients With Onychomycosis (e.g., Dermatophytes Trichophyton Rubrum and T. mentagrophytes, and/or Yeasts Candida Albicans, etc.) (Lunula Laser ) — 2016 — Sponsor and monitor, IRB approved, blind, placebo controlled, clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K153164
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

18) Non-Invasive Dermatological Aesthetic Treatment for the Reduction of Body Circumference (Zerona-Z6) — 2016.

  1. FDA clearance – K162578

19) Market Clearance to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain (FX 635) — 2018 — Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center clinical study.

  1. FDA clearance – K180197
  2. To view NIH clinical trial records, click here.

20) Market Clearance for Relief of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (FX 635) — 2019 — A collection of placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center clinical studies.

  1. FDA clearance – K190572

21) Non-Invasive Dermatological Aesthetic Treatment for the Reduction of Body Circumference in Individuals With a Body Mass Index (BMI) of up to 40 kg / m² 2019 The data used to get this approval combined all previous data Erchonia® had on 20-40 BMI patients in the green laser studies above.

How Do Erchonia® Lasers for Pain Relief Work?

While the benefits of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) have been observed in hundreds of medical studies, the exact mechanisms that lead to these results are still being explored. Although we still have a lot to learn about the effects of light energy on different types of cells, the leading theory is that LLLT generates therapeutic effects through stimulating and enhancing specific biochemical processes within cells. Intuitively speaking, laser energy activates a key enzyme in our cells’ powerhouses (mitochondria), boosting energy production and cellular activity. This process enhances cell function, aids in cell repair and growth, and supports overall cellular health, leading to improved healing and regeneration.

More specifically, utilising the first law in photochemistry (Grotthuss-Draper law), laser energy is transferred to cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) – a respiratory energy-transducing enzyme which is involved in the electron transport chain in mitochondria. This energy transfer causes photodissociation of inhibitory nitric oxide from CcO, leading to an enhancement of enzyme activity, electron transport, mitochondrial respiration, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. Consequently, by altering the cellular redox state, LLLT induces the activation of numerous intracellular signalling pathways, and alters the affinity of transcription factors concerned with cell proliferation, survival, repair, and regeneration.

Erchonia® pain relief lasers utilise true laser technology, optimising photonic energy delivery through the use of monochromatic, collimated, and coherent beams of light. That is, the light emitted by a true laser is composed from photons that have the same wavelength (monochromatic), travel in the same direction / do not disperse (collimated), and are in phase in space and time (coherent). These three properties of true lasers make them the most effective and efficient devices within the Laser Therapy sector.

Erchonia® lasers were specifically designed to deliver the optimal amount of energy required to stimulate and enhance cell function while not damaging cells or producing painful heat sensations – all of our non-thermal LLLT devices are classified as ‘Class II Lasers’ by the FDA in virtue of their low output and very low risk of hazard.

How Do Erchonia® Lasers for Fat Removal Work?

Erchonia® fat removal lasers create a small transitory pore for the fatty liquids in fat cells to seep out. The fatty liquids are then naturally flushed out through the lymphatic system.

The result is that the fat cells shrink instead of being killed. When this happens, the shrunken fat cells begin to act and function like healthy lean cells, releasing the correct messages to the brain and creating a communication effect throughout the fat organ, causing other fat cells to release their content and return their hormone responses to the positive.

Procedures that have been popular in the past (such as fat freezing) focus on the elimination of fat cells, but recent research has shown this approach to be less effective, and in the worst-case scenario, providing counterproductive results.

Erchonia® lasers effectively train fat cells to behave and react differently, and all without excessive heat or cooling.

How Do Erchonia® Lasers for Fungal Nail Treatment Work?

Erchonia® lasers for fungal nail treatment target onychomycosis through the use of two true laser beams (red 635nm and violet 405nm – monochromatic, collimated, and coherent).

The two wavelengths trigger a photochemical reaction, producing Reactive Oxygen Species which is converted to Hydrogen Peroxide – a natural antiseptic that kills onychomycosis.

In addition, the red 635nm wavelength induces the production of Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) which is converted to Nitric Oxide – aiding the natural immune response in fighting the infection.

What Are the Biological Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)?

Clinical studies and trials of Laser Therapy technologies indicate the following beneficial effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT).

  1. Anti-Inflammation. LLLT creates an anti-edema effect by dilating blood vessels and activating the lymphatic drainage system (which drains swollen areas). This reduces swelling caused by trauma or inflammation.
  2. Anti-Pain (Analgesic). LLLT exerts a very beneficial effect on pain in multiple ways: It partially blocks neural transmission of pain signals to the brain; It decreases nerve sensitivity; It lessens pain by reducing edema; It helps to increase the production of high levels of painkilling chemicals such as endorphins, enkephalins, and opioids from the brain and adrenal gland.
  3. Accelerated Tissue Repair and Cell Growth. Photons of light from lasers penetrate deeply into tissues and accelerate cellular reproduction and growth. The laser light also increases the energy available to the cell by increasing ATP production so that the cell can take on nutrients faster and get rid of waste products. As a result of exposure to laser light, all cells, including the cells of tendons, ligaments, and muscles, are repaired faster.
  4. Improved Vascular Activity. LLLT significantly increases the formation of new capillaries in damaged tissue, which speeds up the healing process, closes wounds more quickly, and reduces scarring. LLLT also causes vasodilation – an increase in the diameter of blood vessels – which improves the delivery of blood and healing elements to damaged tissues.
  5. Increased Metabolic Activity. LLLT stimulates higher outputs of specific pro-healing enzymes in blood cells, along with improved oxygen and nutrient delivery.
  6. Trigger Points and Acupuncture Points. LLLT stimulates muscle trigger points and acupuncture points on a non-invasive basis, providing musculoskeletal pain relief.
  7. Reduced Fibrous Tissue Formation. LLLT reduces the formation of scar tissue following damage from cuts, scratches, burns, or surgery.
  8. Improved Nerve Function. Slow recovery of nerves in damaged tissue results in impaired sensory and motor function. LLLT speeds up the process of axonal regeneration and nerve cell reconnection, and increases the amplitude of action potentials to optimize muscle action.
  9. Immunoregulation. LLLT directly affects immunity status by stimulating the production of immunoglobulins and lymphocytes, and by improving the ease of penetration of white blood cells into damaged tissue.
  10. Faster Wound Healing. LLLT stimulates fibroblast development in damaged tissue. Fibroblasts are the building blocks of collagen, which is the essential protein required to replace old tissue or repair tissue injuries. As a result, LLLT is effective on open wounds and burns.
What Is the Difference Between Erchonia® and Other Technologies in This Market?

The efficacy of Erchonia® lasers has been scientifically proven with double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, and multi-site studies. Many competing companies advertise their products as ‘clinically proven’, guaranteeing ‘instant results’. However, these claims are often not backed by comprehensive clinical evidence.

Several companies have FDA-clearance within the Laser Therapy sector, however, in most cases the intended use / indications of their products are quite limiting or not relevant to the marketed applications. Furthermore, these FDA-clearances are often obtained without any scientific research.

We always recommend that you ask for details of the FDA-clearances and make an informed decision. Pay particular attention to the scope of the clearance, whether it involved clinical studies, how many patients participated, were the studies placebo controlled, double blind, and randomised, how many peer reviewed published articles they have, and what the adverse reactions / side effects were – we would be happy to provide this information for you.

What Is the Technical Difference Between Types of Laser Therapy Devices?

To understand the difference between the various types of Laser Therapy devices, it is first important to distinguish between High-Level Laser Therapy (HLLT) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT):

  • HLLT devices are classified as ‘Class IV Lasers’ by the FDA in virtue of having a power output that’s greater than 500mW (i.e. high risk of hazard). The vast majority of HLLT devices have longer near-infrared wavelengths.
  • LLLT devices are classified as either ‘Class IIIB Lasers’, ‘Class IIIR Lasers’, or ‘Class II Lasers’ in virtue of having a power output of 5-500mW, 1-5mW, or <1mW respectively (i.e. lower risk of hazard). The vast majority of LLLT devices have shorter wavelengths.

There is a common misconception, often propagated by the manufacturers of Class 4 Lasers, that high power with longer wavelengths results in:

  1. Deeper penetration, allowing for the treatment of a wider range of conditions.
  2. More efficacious results, due to the delivery of more energy into the cells.

This however, is not correct for the following well-documented reasons:

  1. Laser light with wavelengths exceeding 950nm is highly absorbed by water, preventing much of its energy from penetrating the dermis. This strong absorption can also cause localised heating, leading to discomfort or pain, which may restrict its therapeutic application.
  2. There is an optimal ‘dose’ of laser energy (typically 2-4 joules / cm²) required for therapeutic biostimulation. Deviating from this dose, either by providing significantly less or more energy, can be counterproductive. HLLT devices, with their substantial power outputs, risk surpassing this optimal range.
  3. It is theorised that a minimum energy of 1.7eV per photon is required for therapeutic biostimulation via photochemical means – wavelengths exceeding 730nm cannot deliver this 1.7eV. As a result, HLLT devices, which often operate within these longer wavelengths, may not primarily function through inducing photochemical reactions. Instead, they might rely on alternative mechanisms, such as the therapeutic influence of localised heat generation. However, this approach may be less efficacious compared to biostimulation by photochemistry.

LLLT devices, on the other hand, aim to deliver energy via low output, short wavelength beams of light. The general theory is that this approach transfers the optimal amount of energy for stimulating and enhancing cell function, while not damaging cells or producing painful heat sensations.

Within the LLLT sector however, some of the higher output devices still generate heat / pain. Furthermore, many devices are advertised as ‘lasers’, when in fact they are Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) or Superluminescent Diodes (SLDs). In contrast to LEDs or SLDs, ‘true’ lasers generate monochromatic, collimated, and coherent beams of light. These three properties of true lasers make them the most effective and efficient LLLT devices (c.f. ‘How do Erchonia® Lasers for Pain Relief Work?’ FAQ).

To separate Erchonia® from such technologies, and from HLLT more generally, we say that Erchonia® lasers are ‘non-thermal, true lasers’. That is, our lasers do not produce any heat or painful sensations, and are monochromatic, collimated, and coherent.

What Conditions Can Erchonia® Pain Relief Lasers Help With?

Erchonia® pain relief lasers can help a wide variety of patients, including: Orthopaedic pain – sprains, whiplash, muscular pain, cervical or lumbar radiculopathy, tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome. Our devices have also shown positive effects on individuals with chronic conditions like arthritis and osteoarthritis, and in treating post-surgical pain; Neuropathic pain, including various types of neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy; Pain management for athletes recovering from training or injuries.

What Areas Do Erchonia® Fat Removal Lasers Treat?

Erchonia® lasers for fat removal treat overall body circumference while also allowing your clients to target stubborn areas of fat and cellulite.

Most people who undergo the treatments focus on their midriff and thighs, but the device can also target any area of subcutaneous fat, including bra strap, upper arms, jowls, knees, and more.

Are There Any Conditions Which Would Prevent Patients From Receiving the Treatments?

There are no code regulated contraindications, however, since there are no long-term evaluations on certain conditions, we do not recommend using Erchonia® non-thermal lasers on pregnant women, clients with a pacemaker, or clients with photosensitive epilepsy. We also do not recommend using our devices over an area of known cancer.

Will Erchonia® Lasers Cause Pain or Burning?

Erchonia® are true Non-Thermal Low-Level Lasers and cause no pain or health risks.

What Do Erchonia® Lasers Treat and How Are They Used?

Erchonia® lasers are used in many areas, such as 360-degree fat loss, body sculpting, cellulite reduction, pain management, pre / postsurgical healing, pre / rehabilitation, nail and skin pathologies (e.g. nail fungus and acne), and more.

Not only do our lasers treat specifics, but they also empower the body to function efficiently due to the beneficial effects they have on our cells.

Why Choose Erchonia®?

With over 25 years of experience, 16,000+ devices in the market, and 21 FDA-clearances, Erchonia® Corporation are world leaders in medical-grade Laser Therapy technology for physicians, chiropractors, physical therapists, podiatrists, osteopaths, aesthetics clinics, veterinarians, and many other types of medical / health professionals.

Erchonia® own 21 of the 24 FDA-clearances given to Low-Level Lasers, and the efficacy of our devices has been proven by multiple (level 1) double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, and multi-site clinical studies – the most credible research in the market today.

All Erchonia® laser systems are cut from raw materials, and all of our products go through a rigorous quality control process before delivery to our customers around the world. As a company, we are 85% self-reliant in all facets of our organisation, and all of our products are FDA, ISO, OSHA, and MDSAP compliant.

The Erchonia® mission statement is simply “Quality Not Compromise”, and this is ingrained in every aspect of our business – from an unwavering belief in the limitless potential applications of Low-Level Lasers, down to the care and quality of the smallest component of our devices. Just pick up any Erchonia® product, feel the quality of workmanship, and see the attention to detail that can only come from Erchonia’s near-complete control of the manufacturing and assembly processes that go into each product bearing the Erchonia® name. Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *